Re: SRV continued

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Tuesday, 19 July, 2005 19:39 -0700 "Hallam-Baker, Phillip"
<pbaker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> While we are on the subject of SRV, port numbers etc:
> 
> Why not define SRV prefixes for POP3, IMAP4 and SUBMIT so that
> email applications can auto-configure from the email address
> alone.

Because it raises some very "interesting" issues about just
which server a particular client should be bound to.  The
network-nearest available one or  the one associated with the
same organization as the client are typical possibilities (along
with the somewhat vague "email address") and, if the wrong one
is chosen, it may be inaccessible.  

These issues are discussed in part in draft-hall-email-srv (the
most recent version of which is, I think, expired, partially
because of debates about  the issue raised above.

  john


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]