Re: IANA Considerations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Ned Freed wrote:
>>>This opens the door to the author forgetting to check and the various
>>>reviewers assuming the prsence of the sections means a check was done.
> 
> 
>>The goal of putting it in the template is to encourage it be addressed,
>>rather than forgotten altogether.
> 
> 
> I am well aware of what the goal is, and have been from the beginning of
> this discussion.
> 
> There has never been disagreement as to the goal, only as to the best means to
> achieve it. I have asserted that requiring IANA considerations sections in
> drafts submitted for publication is at best useless and potentially quite
> harmful, and that the best way to insure coverage of IANA issues is to have an
> explicit check for such things as part of our review process.
> 
> I also predicted that two things would happen: (1) A draft containing IANA
> considerations and an empty IANA considertions section would be approved and
> (2) That this section would take on the status of boilerplate in some draft
> templates. Both predictions have now come to pass. 
> 
> 				Ned

Boilerplate doesn't necessarily include the default text per se; the
template I manage has no default, but allows choice of predefined text
where available. The default text is selected only by deliberate choice.

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFCzEH4E5f5cImnZrsRAgqjAJ9/S2Vg+hO7Y4eSNYdQ1Q2xTxHGYgCgkNBQ
pDg6eyzGUEeaUlYJPRJom0M=
=fbmi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]