Brian E Carpenter wrote: > Ned Freed wrote: > >>> Can anyone suggest where I could find the requirement for IANA >>> Considerations? >> >> There is no requirement that such sections appear in published RFCs. This >> debate has never been about what's required in RFCs, but rather what's >> required >> in drafts submitted to the IESG. > > RFC 2434 doesn't discuss null IANA sections at all. RFC2434bis does discuss > them, and we will need to form consensus about whether the RFC Editor is > required to retain them, as we discuss RFC2434bis. Which we need to do > fairly > soon. > > Brian It seems like such considerations are, by definition, relevant only for standards-track RFCs. It is not useful to require it for other documents. Joe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf