Ned Freed wrote: >>Can anyone suggest where I could find the requirement for IANA >>Considerations? > > There is no requirement that such sections appear in published RFCs. This > debate has never been about what's required in RFCs, but rather what's required > in drafts submitted to the IESG. Why are there additional, _unpublished_ requirements to IDs? >>I found it on the website, but it's not listed in any RFC (just in an >>expired ID, one that even mentions that empty IANA Considerations >>sections may be dropped by the RFC Editor upon RFC publication). > > The requirement on the website is what we've been discussing. > > Ned Why is the website inconsistent with the published requirements? I t seems like the need for the IANA Considerations section should be withheld until it is actually formally issued as a requirement. Joe
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf