Hi, My comment on the "Email Submission Between Independent Networks draft-hutzler-spamops-04" document : In the part 4 (external submission), the document offers no recommendation concerning the blocking of SMTP port 25. Even if the ISP decides not to block it, this ISP should be covered by this future RFC to legitimate its choice of closing port 25.(a single MAY can be enough) Regards, Eric Edelstein -----Message d'origine----- De : Dave Crocker [mailto:dhc@xxxxxxxxxxxx] Envoyé : lundi 13 juin 2005 20:44 À : members@xxxxxxxxx Objet : The IETF needs your input about the Spamops document Importance : Haute Folks, This is a request for you action: A draft specification has been submitted to the IETF for standardization as a "Best Current Practices". Information about the document is at: <http://mipassoc.org/spamops/> The document is in the final stages of a public "Last Call" process, during which the IETF's management Steering Group obtains input about interest in the document and hears about possible problems with it. This document did not get developed within the IETF. So there is no record of community interest. Consequently it is particularly important to have active postings from the broad Internet community, expressing their assessment of the document, notably including any plans to implement the specifications. This document is a limited, first-step in specifying voluntary standards for service providers, in their cross-net email operations. Please send your comments to: To: ietf@xxxxxxxx cc: iesg@xxxxxxxx Thanks. d/ --- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking +1.408.246.8253 dcrocker a t ... WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf