Keith, > > > It's as likely to boil down to "how do we get this WG to realize that > > > there really is a serious technical problem with what they've created?" > > > > How about requiring to produce working code (and perhaps operational > > experience) ? > > working code is valuable in some cases - especially where it appears that > the protocol is not easily implemented. but working code won't provide > an indication of how well the protocol works in large deployments in the > wild. for that, analysis and/or modeling are the best tools we have. How many of such analysis and/or modeling has been produced by the IESG ? Yakov. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf