And I've had much *worse* experiences with the IESG requiring changes to documents ... including receiving suggested text (after many months of the document disappearing into a black hole) that actually *reversed* text inserted earlier at the request of an AD. - Ralph On Thu, 2005-04-28 at 15:12 -0700, Randy Presuhn wrote: > Hi - > > > From: "Joe Touch" <touch@xxxxxxx> > > To: "Keith Moore" <moore@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: "John C Klensin" <john-ietf@xxxxxxx>; <ietf@xxxxxxxx>; <john.loughney@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Thursday, April 28, 2005 2:45 PM > > Subject: Re: text suggested by ADs > ... > > Sure - and sometimes other ADs get involved, and it boils down to "what > > can you add/change to appease the other AD" rather than "what is > > sensible to add". > ... > > Though this is an interesting discussion, it is so far removed from my own > experience as a document editor and WG chair that I have to wonder whether > we've been working with the same IESG. > > Randy > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Ietf mailing list > Ietf@xxxxxxxx > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf