Nowhere is perfect [Re: french crypto regulations relating to personal encryption usage by visitors?]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Let's assume that the crypto regulations are a red herring as far
as Paris is concerned. I'd like to state the obvious - every location
we choose for an IETF is a compromise. Jordi Palet took on the job of
writing a first draft of site selection criteria. Things like visa
requirements and crypto regulations should surely figure in that,
and so should travel time, weather, etc. But we have to give a lot
of weight to meeting facilities and the budget, as well.

   Brian

avri@xxxxxxx wrote:

On 3 apr 2005, at 04.39, Eric Rescorla wrote:

I'm not sure what you think the misunderstanding is. That people
are often self-interested and prefer to minimize travel time?
I doubt that's a misunderstanding at all.



I don't agree with this assessment. I think that if the decision where to continue the North American meeting allocation, just requiring them all to be in Canada, most of the complaints would come from people in the US and not from Europeans even though the US travel time would still be optimized.


a.


_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf



_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]