My LORD, it's like I read Margaret's mind... I hadn't seen this post
when I sent my own whine to the list!
Spencer
I'd like to add-on to Spencer's point...
At 6:14 AM -0600 3/2/05, Spencer Dawkins wrote:
- Most important - we expect people to read the drafts before
discussing them at face-to-face meetings, and thought that
considering drafts submitted this morning didn't give working groups
enough time to do necessary homework before having really confused
and confusing discussions
Having the draft available two weeks in advance does very little
good if the WGs don't have agendas posted that tell you what drafts
to read in preparation for the meeting.
At this point, less than one week before the meeting, only 14 WGs
(not counting BOFs) have agendas posted. I'm at a loss for a
suitable adjective.
Margaret
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf