Re: Last Call: 'Labels in Subject Headers Considered Ineffective At Best' to Informational RFC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: "JFC (Jefsey) Morfin" <jefsey@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Last Call: 'Labels in Subject Headers Considered Ineffective At Best' to Informational RFC
From: Carl Malamud <carl@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 02:30:38 -0800 (PST)
Cc: Randy Presuhn <randy_presuhn@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ietf@xxxxxxxx, iesg@xxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <6.1.2.0.2.20050225020817.037e7eb0@mail.jefsey.com>
Organization: Memory Palace Press
Sender: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx

> A very simple solution would be to write the documents in French :-)
> 

That would be illegal.  ;)

Carl

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Last Call: 'Labels in Subject Headers Considered Ineffective At Best' to Informational RFC
  - From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin

References:
- Re: Last Call: 'Labels in Subject Headers Considered Ineffective At Best' to Informational RFC
  - From: JFC (Jefsey) Morfin

Prev by Date: Re: MARID back from the grave?
Next by Date: 2004/05 NomCom Selections
Previous by thread: Re: Last Call: 'Labels in Subject Headers Considered Ineffective At Best' to Informational RFC
Next by thread: Re: Last Call: 'Labels in Subject Headers Considered Ineffective At Best' to Informational RFC
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]