Re: MARID back from the grave?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Um, I'm maybe an innocent bystander here, but perhaps the following works?

a) renaming of the root portion of the file-name is permitted, nay encouraged, to identify whether the draft is currently individual, or owned by a group (or even to select a 'better' name for other reasons);

b) the revision number is NOT reset when the name is otherwise changed;

c) all drafts must include a revision history including the full name under which each draft was presented.

This makes clear the current status, the prior status, whether the draft is new (-00) or not, and enables the other obvious rules. IETF secretariat and others can clearly see when a draft is new or not, and everyone can (we hope) see who 'owns' the draft and its rough subject from the file name.


-- David Singer Apple Computer/QuickTime

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]