On 24 Feb 2005, at 10:00, Carl Malamud wrote:
Merci bien pour votre suggestions ... JSPF (Je suis pas francais). :))
Tiny grammatical nits in the last paragraph of section 5:
- In summary, for senders and receivers of email, use of the - "No-Solicit:" mechanism would be simply to understand and use. For - policy makers, it would be extremely simply to specify the format and + In summary, for senders and receivers of email, the + "No-Solicit:" mechanism would be simple to understand and use. For + policy makers, it would be extremely simple to specify the format and placement of the solicitation class keyword. (Needless to say, the issue of how to define what classes of messages are subject to such a requirement and how to enforce it are beyond the scope of this discussion.)
Joe
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf