Re: some pending IASA issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jefsey, you are proposing involving the regional and local chapters in
the standards process.

That's a major shift both for the ISOC and for the IETF.  It's also
inconsistent as far as I can tell with what other organizations like
IEEE that have both chapters and standards-related activities do.


I agree with you that some members of regional and local ISOC chapters
would (and do) bring significant value to the standards process.

I question though whether directly involving the regional and local
chapters would actually be the right way of involving these people why
not involve them directly?


Also, I'm concerned that there might be some significant disadvantages
to directly involving regional and local chapters in the standards
work.  Traditionally we've had problems/friction when
marketing/management types get involved in the IETF.  At best it slows
things down.


However I think ISOC wants to have a broad appeal with its local
chapters pulling in people from all parts of Internet business.


--Sam

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]