Re: Progress report......

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



on re-reading this, I think John and I are saying the same thing. I missed that in my earlier read. Serves me for replying too early in the morning :-(


--On torsdag, januar 27, 2005 09:07:11 +0100 Harald Tveit Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


John,
just one comment:

--On 26. januar 2005 10:55 -0500 John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:

However, if the terms and conditions of the current
relationship with Foretec were acceptable to us long-term, we
would not have initiated the Admin Reorganization process, which
you, as participants in the community, presumably know perfectly
well

I believe (and have told Bob Kahn that too) that if the Foretec stuff had been working perfectly, we would STILL do the reorganization. In fact, I believe that if it had been a fully functional working relationship with nobody seeing an advantage to the current undefined state of relationships, the reorganization would have happened long before I took on the job as IETF chair. As you known, having been part of the effort to take steps in the same direction....

                  Harald





_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf






_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]