Re: Progress report......

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



John,
just one comment:

--On 26. januar 2005 10:55 -0500 John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:

However, if the terms and conditions of the current
relationship with Foretec were acceptable to us long-term, we
would not have initiated the Admin Reorganization process, which
you, as participants in the community, presumably know perfectly
well

I believe (and have told Bob Kahn that too) that if the Foretec stuff had been working perfectly, we would STILL do the reorganization.
In fact, I believe that if it had been a fully functional working relationship with nobody seeing an advantage to the current undefined state of relationships, the reorganization would have happened long before I took on the job as IETF chair.
As you known, having been part of the effort to take steps in the same direction....


                 Harald





_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]