RE: Discussion: #822 legal review 3: Legal advice

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I ahve made the change suggested by Harald.

Bert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of
> Harald Tveit Alvestrand
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 10:23
> To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Discussion: #822 legal review 3: Legal advice
> 
> 
> The discussion of legal advice (Jorge's third point) seems to 
> have revealed 
> that there are two issues here:
> 
> - Should legal advice be sought? That's almost too obvious to 
> state, but 
> might be worth stating anyway...... I suggest that we add to 
> paragraph 4 of 
> section 3.1, "IAD responsibilities". This used to be:
> 
>    The IAD negotiates service contracts, with input, as appropriate,
>    from other bodies, and with review, as appropriate, by the 
> IAOC.  The
>    IAOC should establish guidelines for what level of review 
> is expected
>    based on contract type, size, cost, or duration.  ISOC executes
>    contracts on behalf of the IASA, after whatever review 
> ISOC requires
>    to ensure that the contracts meet ISOC's legal and financial
>    requirements.
> 
> This could be changed to read:
> 
>    The IAD negotiates service contracts, with input, as appropriate,
>    from other bodies, including legal advice, and with review, as
>    appropriate, by the IAOC.  The
>    IAOC should establish guidelines for what level of review 
> is expected
>    based on contract type, size, cost, or duration.  ISOC executes
>    contracts on behalf of the IASA, after whatever review 
> ISOC requires
>    to ensure that the contracts meet ISOC's legal and financial
>    requirements.
> 
> The other point raised is whether the legal advice for IASA 
> needs to be 
> independent from ISOC's legal advice. Consideration so far 
> seems to be that 
> "sometimes this would be good, sometimes this would be 
> indifferent or extra 
> overhead - hard to codify in this BCP".
> 
> Should we leave that as "no change proposed"?
> 
>                   Harald
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Ietf mailing list
> Ietf@xxxxxxxx
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
> 

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]