Re: Legal review 4: Minor editorial

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




--On Friday, 21 January, 2005 15:45 +0100 Harald Tveit
Alvestrand <harald@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 7 (Transparency):  While I understand the desire for
> transparency, there may be some contracts that contain items
> that are justifiably
> treated as confidential (such as individual performance
> rewards,
> terms of settlement of litigation).  To address this point, I
> might add the following words at the end of the penultimate
> sentence:
> ", subject to any reasonable confidentiality obligations
> approved
> by the IAD."

Harald, given the general commitment in the community and
document to transparancy whenever possible, I wonder whether the
IAD should be empowered to do this or should, e.g., be required
to report the terms and nature of what confidentiality
obligations are being assumed to the IAOC so that they can
review it as appropriate.  Note that I'm not proposing
disclosing the confidential information to them, but it seems to
me to be reasonable to tell them the nature of what is being
kept secret and why.

   john


_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]