-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2005-01-14, at 11.50, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > John C Klensin wrote: > >> ... but I note that we are still turning over rocks from >> which new issues crawl. > > And the first year of operation will certainly reveal > other issues, which may move faster than a crawl. > > I am deeply convinced we will be revising this BCP after > a year's experience. So I think we will very soon have to > agree to leave some known issues open. > > (fyi, the average lifetime of the first two versions of > the IETF standards process and of the Nomcom procedures > was 24 months... it seems to take us a couple of iterations > and ~4 years to get a process BCP right.) I would like to voice support for Brian's statement. I think that we need to realise that we can't foresee all issues and our anticipation's of them are best guesses. There is nothing like real-life experience and at some point we need start getting that instead of arguing. - - kurtis - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.1 iQA/AwUBQefksaarNKXTPFCVEQIGHwCg3ubaU2mF7r+1z8evNZ0PUiiP+PoAnA2p raE6Pf0VPgCk9i38WUebmTX4 =Jx0a -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf