Re: Consensus? #746 3.4 IAOC decision making

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Consensus? #746 3.4 IAOC decision making
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:39:00 +0100
In-reply-to: <F00E78AC2462145BC59C5CC2@askvoll.hjemme.alvestrand.no>
Organization: IBM
Sender: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:

"if consensus cannot be achieved, the decision will be made by voting" seems simplest to me.


Yes
   Brian

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

References:
- Consensus? #746 3.4 IAOC decision making
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand
- Re: Consensus? #746 3.4 IAOC decision making
  - From: John C Klensin
- Re: Consensus? #746 3.4 IAOC decision making
  - From: Harald Tveit Alvestrand

Prev by Date: Re: Consensus search: #725 3.4b Appealing decisions
Next by Date: Re: Suggest no change: #739 Assuring ISOC commitment to AdminRest
Previous by thread: Re: Consensus? #746 3.4 IAOC decision making
Next by thread: RE: Consensus? #746 3.4 IAOC decision making
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IETF] [IP Storage] [Yosemite News] [Linux SCTP] [Linux Newbies] [Fedora Users]