Re: Suggest no change: #739 Assuring ISOC commitment to AdminRest

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



note that in the resolutions that accepted the IETF process BCPs 
(2026 for example) also had text that said that the ISOC aggreed to
undertake the role described in the document for the ISOC

i.e. I would expect that both would be in a single motion

Scott

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]