|
"Minimum staff required" seems uncomfortably worded to me. I am not sure we need to go into this detail, for the reason Scott listed. If we do need to have this leel of detail, could we say 'sufficient staff' or something along those lines?
John L
------------------- Original message -------------------
Subject: Re: Consensus? #733 Outsourcing principle
From: "Scott W Brim" <sbrim@xxxxxxxxx>
Time: 01/12/2005 7:29 am
On 1/12/2005 04:51, Harald Tveit Alvestrand allegedly wrote:
> In principle, IETF administrative functions should be
> outsourced. Decisions to perform specific functions > "in-house" should be explicitly justified by the IAOC > and restricted to the minimum staff required, with these > decisions and staffing reviewed by the IAOC on a regular > basis and against a "zero base" assumption. > "Minimum staff required" is a little difficult. One can do anything with existing staff if quality and timeliness don't matter. The IAOC has to determine those parameters as part of deciding staffing levels. I suggest "minimum staff required to perform the functions satisfactorily as determined by the IAOC", or something along those lines. Scott
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf |
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf