Re: Consensus? #733 Outsourcing principle

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Title: Converted from Rich Text
This seems reasonable to me.
 
John L.
 
> John Klensin suggested the following text for the first sentence, and
> Scott Bradner supported the idea:
>
> In principle, IETF administrative functions should be
> outsourced. Decisions to perform specific functions
> "in-house" should be explicitly justified by the IAOC
> and restricted to the minimum staff required, with these
> decisions and staffing reviewed by the IAOC on a regular
> basis and against a "zero base" assumption.
>
> We have to adjust the second sentence (referring to "such contracts"
> would become ambiguous), so the total paragraph becomes:
>
> In principle, IETF administrative functions should be
> outsourced. Decisions to perform specific functions
> "in-house" should be explicitly justified by the IAOC
> and restricted to the minimum staff required, with these
> decisions and staffing reviewed by the IAOC on a regular
> basis and against a "zero base" assumption.
>
> The IAD is responsible for negotiating and maintaining outsourcing
> contracts, as well as providing any coordination necessary to make
> sure the IETF administrative support functions are covered properly.
> The IAOC is accountable for the structure of the IASA and thus
> decides which functions are to be outsourced. All outsourcing must
> be via well-defined contracts or equivalent instruments. Both
> outsourced and in-house functions must be clearly specified and
> documented with well-defined deliverables, service level agreements,
> and transparent accounting for the cost of such functions.
>
> Is that OK with everyone? Case closed?
_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]