Re: Definitions, names, and confusion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 09:10 12/01/2005, Harald Tveit Alvestrand wrote:
actually the BCP label has multiple, largely disjunct areas of coverage.

I once (many years back) suggested splitting the categories into Recommended Internet Practices and Directives for Oversight and Administration, but the acronyms didn't survive the laugh test....

I suppose this is not only the laugh test but the consistency test; both also are using words of authority ("Recommeded" and "Directive").


A BCP definition makes it a cultural/procedural equivalent to an accepted Standard.
This is why I proposed "Documented Best Practices" (DCP) and a "Suggested Best Practice" (SCP) as simple mnemonics to compare with the "for information" and usual proposition concepts the Common Practice area is not permitted.


jfc




_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]