"Soininen Jonne (Nokia-NET/Helsinki)" <jonne.soininen@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Bert, > > On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 16:46, ext Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote: >> Scott reponds to Jonne: >> > >> > Jonne asks: >> > > would >> > > x.x Compensation for IOAC members >> > > The IOAC members shall not receive any compensation (apart from >> > > reimbursement of expenses) for their services as members of the >> > > IOAC." >> > > >> > > do the trick then? >> > >> > works for me >> > >> personal opinion: >> Not for me. It seems to make it autotmatic that IAOC members DO receive >> reimbursement for expenses. I think I can live with the fact that thye >> may get it in special circumstances, but I do not like the idea >> that text suggests that it is normal to reimburse them. >> >> The current text in section 3, 1st para states >> >> .... The IAOC consists of volunteers, .... >> >> does that not say enough? > > I don't think that is quite enough, IMHO. I think the fact that the IAOC > members are not to be payed for their services (no compensation for lost > free time) should be documented. I am (as my original proposal was not > to have the IAOC people reimbursed at all) sympathetic of the idea to > optimise the IASA funds by having reimbursements being rather an > exception than a rule. I just thought that many people were saying that > they for some reason would like the IAOC being treated a bit better than > the IESG/IAB... I don't think that anyone is saying that. However, AFAIK there's in fact no rule prohibiting IESG/IAB members from being directly paid by IETF--not that that's a likely event. -Ekr _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf