Re: Issue: #748: Section 5.4 - Quarterly deposits inappropriate

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 10:14 PM +0100 12/21/04, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
So how about this possible text:

  5.4  Other ISOC Support

   Other ISOC support shall be based on the budget process as specified
   in Section 6.  ISOC will periodically credit additional funds to the
   IASA accounts to cover anticipated expenditures for that period
   within the yearly budget.


I think this makes sense. It doesn't call out any specific period (avoiding the "quarterly" issue), but it does reinforce that it is a periodic activity within the year, connected to planning periods set out in the yearly budget. That makes sense to me, given what we're doing. regards, Ted Hardie

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]