> Bert asks: > > > So how about this possible text: > > > > 5.4 Other ISOC Support > > > > Other ISOC support shall be based on the budget process as specified > > in Section 6. ISOC will periodically credit additional funds to the > > IASA accounts to cover anticipated expenditures for that period > > within the yearly budget. > > how about > 5.4 Other ISOC Support > > Other ISOC support shall be based on the budget process as specified > in Section 6. ISOC will periodically ensure that there are sufficient > funds available in the IASA accounts to cover anticipated > expenditures for that period within the yearly budget. > > "credit additional funds" is an operationsl detail that I do > not think is needed > But does your text not boil down to the same process? And we have used "credit funds to IASA accounts" in other places, so my text seems consistent with the rest of the doc. ANd Maragerts text (which you had claimed: wfm) also uses "credit additional funds". So... why is it an issue when I suggest it? Bert > Scott > _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf