--On 11. desember 2004 10:59 -0500 John C Klensin <john-ietf@xxxxxxx> wrote:
I think getting this into wider community review, i.e. due to LC, is a good thing to do at this point, even while some of us, myself included, continue to argue on particular points we are uncomfortable with.
I think we generally agree. I'm not opposed to doing it this way and can see some advantages; I just think it is important that we be extremely clear about what we are doing and that the final result really reflects community consensus. Seeing a note from Harald that seemed to explain why were weren't quite ready for a Last Call and then a Last Call announcement is, to me, the sort of thing that calls for comment.
My thinking between the Wednesday note (which said "we can't send out the Last Call today") and the Thursday Last Call was that we had a proposed resolution of the issue that seemed to be accepted and was not (in my judgment) a significant change to the document - so I figured it was "close enough", and emitted the Last Call.
The previous schedule had the Last Call being emitted on Wednesday.
See Thursday's Last Call notice and my Saturday response to John in this thread for the rest of my thinking.
Harald
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf