RE: bcp-02: Section 3.4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I guess I am of the "less formal" type of person.
We can send omcplaints/concerns ot IAOC.
We ssume IAOC will handle/act on it
If they do not, we can start the recall process on them

Maybe I am just too simple minded.

Bert

> -----Original Message-----
> From: avri@xxxxxxx [mailto:avri@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: Sunday, December 12, 2004 15:17
> To: Wijnen, Bert (Bert)
> Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx; Sam Hartman
> Subject: Re: bcp-02: Section 3.4
> 
> 
> Well,
> 
> A letter of complaint requires no response unless there is something 
> that formalizes the requirement of response.
> 
> And if there is no procedure indicating that the IAOC needs to pay 
> attention to a letter of complain, that decision, i.e the one 
> to ignore 
> letters of complain, cannot be appealed.
> 
> So, as I see it, without a formalized process of complaint/appeal of 
> IAD actions we are left with no avenue to deal with problems 
> other then 
> by the yearly nomcom process and the IETF list.
> 
> 
> On 11 dec 2004, at 22.18, Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
> 
> > Avri writes:
> >> Unless I am missing something in the document, there is no 
> way for a
> >> member of the IETf community to formally ask the IAOC to review the
> >> decisions of the IAD.
> >
> > Since when would you not be allowed to send an email/complaint to
> > the IAOC ??
> >
> > I guess you meant to say that there is not "formal way" to do so,
> 
> yeah, that is what i explicitly said.
> 
> > but we're all adults and we CAN communicate, can we not?
> 
> what does being an adult have to do with it?
> I don't understand.  The issue is that there is no way to 
> make the IAOC 
> take notice of the communication.
> 
> >
> > I.e. I do not see why we would need to make a formal procedure for
> > this.
> 
> Because the lack of formalization leaves the IETF community without a 
> means to appeal decisions.  And this decreases the level of 
> accountability.
> 
> And of the things I thought that were driving the entire AdminRest 
> process was the need for transparency and accountability.  And as I 
> understand accountability in the IETF, it involves handling appeals 
> from the IETF community.
> 
> a.
> 

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]