Consensus? Variance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



After reviewing the discussion on this topic, I think the rough consensus is conformant with this suggestion:

- Remove the 2nd ("Disclaimer:") paragraph from section 5

- Insert the following as part of section 3 (I suggest just before section 3.1):

 If the IASA is unable to comply with the procedures described in this
 document for legal, accounting or practical reasons, the IAOC shall report
 that fact to the community, along with the variant procedure it intends to
 follow. If the problem is a long-term one, the IAOC shall ask the IETF
 to update this document to reflect the changed procedure.

(Comparision to previouis suggestion: I changed "here" to "in this document" to make sure it covers the whole BCP, not just the section it appears in. I also changed IAOC to IASA in the third word - if the IAD is unable to comply with procedures, IAOC is responsible for reporting that to the community, too.)

(Note: A deviation from procedures without appropriate justification is certainly an action of the IAOC that can be appealed. See next message.)

OK?

                     Harald


_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]