Inline > -----Original Message----- > From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of > Brian E Carpenter > Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 11:33 > To: ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: iasa-bcp-01 - ISOC support > > > > 7. ISOC Responsibilities for IASA > ... > > Independence: The IASA should be financially and legally distinct > > from other ISOC activities. > > Since it's a unit of ISOC, it can't be legally distinct. We > have discussion elsewhere of the financial arrangements. > So I would reduce this sentence to > > Independence: The IASA shall be distinct from other ISOC > activities. > makes sense to me personally but also to me as co-editor. Speak up if you (anyone) do not agree, because I intend to make the change. > > > ... IETF meeting fees shall be deposited > > in a separate IETF-specific financial account and > used to fund the > > IASA under the direction and oversight of the IAOC. > Any fees or > > payments collected from IETF meeting sponsors should also be > > deposited into this account. The IAD administers > this account and > > uses it to fund the IASA in accordance with a budget > and policies > > developed as described above. > > This is all repetition of earlier stuff and should be deleted. > Not sure. It lists the ISOC responsibilities. We have listed responsibilities of IAD, IAOC etc, and some of that is also a repeat. I think the original authors (text is mainly unchanged from the wasserman-bcp draft) were trying to make sure that the ISOC responsibilities were listed in one place for easy review by ISOC... not sure though. Margaret/Leslie?? > > > > Support: ISOC may, from time to time, choose to transfer > > other funds into the IASA account to fund IETF administrative > > projects or to cover IETF meeting revenue shortfalls. There may > > also be cases > > where ISOC chooses to loan money to the IASA to help with > > temporary cash flow issues. These cases should be documented > > carefully and tracked on both sides. ISOC will work to provide > > the operational reserve for IASA functioning described above. > > This is also repetition. Either delete it, or reduce it to a single > sentence referring back to earlier text. > same answer as before. reducing some of this text to reference to earlier text seems like a good suggestion to me (personally). Have not concluded yet if we really should do it. Bert > Brian _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf