Re: Adminrest: section 3.4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Wijnen, Bert (Bert) wrote:
Can we have other peoples opinion on this topic as well?

Scott's change makes sense to me

Brian

Bert


-----Original Message-----
From: sob@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sob@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 16:31
To: bwijnen@xxxxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; sob@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Adminrest: section 3.4



So in light of this, would you still suggest your change of text?

yes - I read the text as a specific instruction to the IAOC to implement the begining of the paragraph - i.e. its not enough that the IESG & IAB are OK with the support they are getting they have to consider the support the whole IETF is getting

Scott

-0---
From bwijnen@xxxxxxxxxx Thu Dec 2 09:20:04 2004
X-Original-To: sob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-To: sob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: sob@xxxxxxxxxxx, ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: Adminrest: section 3.4
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:19:45 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain


Scott writes:

draft-ietf-iasa-bcp-01 section 3.4 says

3.4  Relationship of the IAOC to Existing IETF Leadership

The IAOC is directly accountable to the IETF community for the
performance of the IASA. However, the nature of the IAOC's work
involves treating the IESG and IAB as internal

customers. The IAOC

and the IAD should not consider their work successful

unless the IESG

and IAB are satisfied with the administrative support

that they are

  receiving.

I'd suggest that the last sentence be changed to:
"The IAOC and the IAD should not consider their work

successful unless

the IESG and IAB are satisfied with the administrative support that the IETF is receiving."


Makes sense to me somewhat.
However, the first sentence basically speaks to the effect that IETF
should be happy. There is lots of extra admin support that IESG and IAB
will get from the IASA that is not so visible to the larger IETF.
And I think that is what we were trying to capture.


So in light of this, would you still suggest your change of text?

Bert

Scott


_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf


_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]