Can we have other peoples opinion on this topic as well? Bert > -----Original Message----- > From: sob@xxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sob@xxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 16:31 > To: bwijnen@xxxxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; sob@xxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: Adminrest: section 3.4 > > > > So in light of this, would you still suggest your change of text? > > yes - I read the text as a specific instruction to the IAOC to > implement the begining of the paragraph - i.e. its not enough > that the IESG & IAB are OK with the support they are getting they > have to consider the support the whole IETF is getting > > Scott > > -0--- > From bwijnen@xxxxxxxxxx Thu Dec 2 09:20:04 2004 > X-Original-To: sob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Delivered-To: sob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > From: "Wijnen, Bert (Bert)" <bwijnen@xxxxxxxxxx> > To: sob@xxxxxxxxxxx, ietf@xxxxxxxx > Subject: RE: Adminrest: section 3.4 > Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 15:19:45 +0100 > MIME-Version: 1.0 > X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) > Content-Type: text/plain > > Scott writes: > > > > draft-ietf-iasa-bcp-01 section 3.4 says > > > > 3.4 Relationship of the IAOC to Existing IETF Leadership > > > > The IAOC is directly accountable to the IETF community for the > > performance of the IASA. However, the nature of the IAOC's work > > involves treating the IESG and IAB as internal > customers. The IAOC > > and the IAD should not consider their work successful > unless the IESG > > and IAB are satisfied with the administrative support > that they are > > receiving. > > > > I'd suggest that the last sentence be changed to: > > "The IAOC and the IAD should not consider their work > successful unless > > the IESG and IAB are satisfied with the administrative > > support that the IETF is receiving." > > > > Makes sense to me somewhat. > However, the first sentence basically speaks to the effect that IETF > should be happy. There is lots of extra admin support that > IESG and IAB > will get from the IASA that is not so visible to the larger IETF. > And I think that is what we were trying to capture. > > So in light of this, would you still suggest your change of text? > > Bert > > Scott > _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf