On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 04:38:37PM +0100, Brian E Carpenter allegedly wrote: > It didn't. For an effort always expected to take at least 15 years, > we are doing OK. > > It is always good to learn from history, of course.
That's funny. I recall that when we started we expected it to *last* 15 years, or less, during which time we would come up with a truly new routing & addressing architecture.
any hint of what was dreamed at that time ? The real issue is here. We will certainly go THROUGH IPv6 just in order to get a /128 plan, on our way to the /256 one. The real issue is what is going to be the new routing architecture?
jfc
_______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf