Carsten, I think that being deprived of the possibility to debate in the high bandwidth forum provided the FTF some issues that would better address these issues qualifies as being disfranchised... I am willing to improve my English, but based on the definition posted by Adrian, I think that it fits. I hope I clarifies. Stephane _____ Stephane H. Maes, PhD, Director of Architecture - Mobile, Oracle Corporation. Ph: +1-203-300-7786 (mobile/SMS); Fax / UM: +1-650-607-6296. e-mail: stephane.maes@xxxxxxxxxx IM: shmaes (AIM, Y!) or stephane_maes@xxxxxxxxxxx (MSN Messenger) -----Original Message----- From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx> To: Stephane Maes <stephane.maes@xxxxxxxxxx> CC: Carsten Bormann <cabo@xxxxxxx>; ietf@xxxxxxxx <ietf@xxxxxxxx> Sent: Sat Nov 06 21:33:31 2004 Subject: Re: [Inquiry #19085] Issue with Meeting Schedule change at the last moment On Nov 06 2004, at 21:27 Uhr, Stephane H. Maes wrote: > disfranchised If you really have to continue your crusade on the IETF list, can you at least stop using this word (assuming you mean disenfranchised)? There is no voting in the IETF, so you can't be deprived of any voting right. Gruesse, Carsten _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf