> If your "reduce the load enough that things can be > gotten out faster will result in deadlines closer to the > meetings" hypothesis is correct, then I'd expect that we would > already have had a review --initiated by either by the IESG or > the Secretariat and discussed with the community-- about how > much closer the deadlines could be moved, fwiw without changing the rules the closest we can get is two weeks see RFC 2418 section 7.1 All relevant documents to be discussed at a session should be published and available as Internet-Drafts at least two weeks before a session starts. _______________________________________________ Ietf@xxxxxxxx https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf