[Last-Call] Re: [OPS-DIR]Re: Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-28

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Resent from the correct email address, to evade moderation.

Moderators: please drop my other identical email from your moderation
queue if possible.

On 3/4/25 02:41, Brotman, Alex wrote:
>> - Have the XML, XSD, and ABNF verified via tools? The shepherd report says
>> no.
>> Was there a reason for only manual checks?
> I believe the XSD was validated (by someone else).  I'll double check the ABNF and XML.

I have validated the XSD and the XML files included in the draft. For
reference and reproducibility, here's how I did it:

# Get XMLSchema.xsd from W3C
curl -O https://www.w3.org/2012/04/XMLSchema.xsd

# Validate our XSD using xmllint and the W3C schema
xmllint --noout --schema XMLSchema.xsd dmarc-xml-0.2.xsd
Output: dmarc-xml-0.2.xsd validates

# Validate our XML using xmllint
xmllint --noout --schema dmarc-xml-0.2.xsd dmarc-xml-0.2.xml
Output: dmarc-xml-0.2.xml validates


The ABNF tool at https://author-tools.ietf.org/abnf give me 4 instances of:

  warning: %s"..." requires use of RFC7405

for the ABNF in this draft.


Daniel K.

-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux