[Last-Call] Re: Last Call: <draft-bray-unichars-10.txt> (Unicode Character Repertoire Subsets) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Mar 2, 2025 at 6:59 AM Orie <orie@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

Based on the discussions here, I have a slight preference to remove the profiles.
I'd say that it would be better to convince Peter that they are needed, than myself.
I agree with his comments here:  https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/Mg0w20A0g9qAAh8jYzcaPoBLpuA/

Hi,

I am a bit more bitter. What the IETF did here was have the authors write uselessly general PRECIS profiles (wasting their time). That doesn't mean PRECIS is bad. It's just that the IETF didn't understand the problem here, or the solution presented in this draft. I did, even if I don't agree with everything in the document. I would be even looser. We don't get the opportunity to nitpick and correct an avalanche.

It's fine to refer to PRECIS and say to consult that for identifiers and such.

thanks,
Rob
-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux