Hi,
Based on the discussions here, I have a slight preference to remove the profiles.
I'd say that it would be better to convince Peter that they are needed, than myself.
I agree with his comments here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/Mg0w20A0g9qAAh8jYzcaPoBLpuA/
Regards,
OS
Based on the discussions here, I have a slight preference to remove the profiles.
I'd say that it would be better to convince Peter that they are needed, than myself.
I agree with his comments here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/Mg0w20A0g9qAAh8jYzcaPoBLpuA/
Regards,
OS
On Sat, Mar 1, 2025 at 4:13 PM Tim Bray <tbray@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Feb 28, 2025 at 6:14:57 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:IANA has asked me (as the designated expert for the PRECIS Profiles
registry) to review the IANA registrations in draft-bray-unichars-10.
However, my sense from list discussion is that the next version of the
document might remove the PRECIS profiles. Are the authors leaning in
that direction? See below for more context.Our feelings on the subject aren't strong, but we agree that it seems the path forward is smoother without the profiles. We'd like to retain the section 2.2 language citing RFC7564 and encouraging readers to consult it. At this point consensus is Orie's call and we're OK with whatever he says.
- Tim & Paul
-- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
