Hi Peter, > On 2 Mar 2025, at 13:10, Peter Thomassen <peter=40desec.io@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2/21/25 01:44, Tony Li via Datatracker wrote: >> >> Reviewer: Tony Li >> Review result: Has Nits >> OPSDIR review of draft-ietf-dnsop-generalized-notify-06 >> Reviewer: Tony Li >> Disclaimer: I am not a DNS expert and I do not play one on TV. I have >> not helped with DNS operations since the 1980's. I am not up to speed >> on DNSsec. I'm sorry, but I cannot devote the time necessary to do all >> of the background reading that is outlined in Section 1. >> Overall: Ready, with nits >> Section 3.2: >> It is also possible to publish child-specific records, where >> in place of the wildcard label, the child's FQDN with the >> parent zone's labels stripped is used. >> Please reword. > > This wording is the result of the WG reworking this sentence during WGLC [1]. The authors think that if we reworded this, it would not have WG consensus at this point -- so we'd prefer to keep it as is. Please let us know if that doesn't work for you! I think that paragraph could be made easier to read without departing from the working group's consensus. For example: "It is also possible to publish child-specific records where the parent zone's labels are stripped from the child's FQDN and the result is used in place of the wildcard label." I find this a little easier to parse than the original, although clearly YMMV. Joe -- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
