[Last-Call] Re: Last Call: <draft-klensin-idna-rfc5891bi s-09.txt> (Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA): Registry Restrictions and Recommendations) to Pro posed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi David, Eric,
At 07:38 AM 19-02-2025, David Conrad wrote:
It would probably be helpful if you provided a URL for the blog your quoting. I presume you're talking about <https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/new-icann-project-explores-the-drivers-of-malicious-domain-name-registrations-25-04-2023-en>https://www.icann.org/en/blogs/details/new-icann-project-explores-the-drivers-of-malicious-domain-name-registrations-25-04-2023-en.

Yes.

FWIW, the INFERMAL report was published. It's <https://infermal.korlabs.io/static/documents/infermal.pdf>https://infermal.korlabs.io/static/documents/infermal.pdf.

Thanks for sharing the INFERMAL report.  I was looking for it.

At 09:58 AM 19-02-2025, Eric Rescorla wrote:
It's hardly a surprise that those who do a lot of registrations prefer registrars
with low prices.

Yes.

 Surely you're not asking the IETF to take the position
that high registration prices are good.

I would invite anyone interested in the topic to read the paper which David Conrad shared as it also includes other angles of the phishing problem.

Regards,
S. Moonesamy
--
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux