[Last-Call] Re: Last Call: <draft-klensin-idna-rfc5891bi s-09.txt> (Internationalized Domain Names in Applications (IDNA): Registry Restrictions and Recommendations) to Pro posed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 18, 2025 at 02:29:18PM -0800,
 S Moonesamy <sm+ietf@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote 
 a message of 54 lines which said:

> The following is from RFC 5039 which was published in the IETF Stream:

Process remark: it is informational while the IDNA draft asks for
Standards Track.

> My reading of the above is that some people within the IETF
> community discussed economic incentives.  I didn't find any rule
> which prevents such a discussion within the context of the draft.

OK, if there is a serious discussion about business issues in every
RFC (HTTP cookies…).

-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux