Thank you. My feedback is addressed. No further comments from my side.
On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 2:39 PM Ron Bonica <rbonica@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks for the careful review. Your comments are addressed in version 07 (just posted)
Ron
Juniper Business Use Only
From: Prachi Jain via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2025 10:55 PM
To: secdir@xxxxxxxx <secdir@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-router-alert.all@xxxxxxxx <draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-router-alert.all@xxxxxxxx>; ipv6@xxxxxxxx <ipv6@xxxxxxxx>; last-call@xxxxxxxx <last-call@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-router-alert-06[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Reviewer: Prachi Jain
Review result: Has Nits
The document is well-written, and I agree that the security concern surrounding
the IPv6 Router Alert Option is valid. I don’t have much to add from a security
standpoint, everything looks in order.
Regarding the Security Considerations section, I have a nit: please adjust the
RFC references to align with the proper citation style. For example: 'These
security considerations can be found in [RFC2711], [RFC6192], and [RFC6398].'
Additionally, in the IANA Considerations section, please ensure that the word
‘Deprecated’ is placed in "".
-- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
