[Last-Call] Re: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-router-alert-06

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Thanks for the careful review. Your comments are addressed in version 07 (just posted)

                                     Ron



Juniper Business Use Only


From: Prachi Jain via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2025 10:55 PM
To: secdir@xxxxxxxx <secdir@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-router-alert.all@xxxxxxxx <draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-router-alert.all@xxxxxxxx>; ipv6@xxxxxxxx <ipv6@xxxxxxxx>; last-call@xxxxxxxx <last-call@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-6man-deprecate-router-alert-06
 
[External Email. Be cautious of content]


Reviewer: Prachi Jain
Review result: Has Nits

The document is well-written, and I agree that the security concern surrounding
the IPv6 Router Alert Option is valid. I don’t have much to add from a security
standpoint, everything looks in order.

Regarding the Security Considerations section, I have a nit: please adjust the
RFC references to align with the proper citation style. For example: 'These
security considerations can be found in [RFC2711], [RFC6192], and [RFC6398].'

Additionally, in the IANA Considerations section, please ensure that the word
‘Deprecated’ is placed in "".


-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux