On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 4:11 AM Antoine Fressancourt via Datatracker <noreply@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Reviewer: Antoine Fressancourt
Review result: Ready
[...]
Based on my review, if I was on the IESG I would ballot this document as YES or
NO OBJECTION.
The document is very clearly written, and understandable.
Thank you for your review Antoine.
A (very) minor remark I have about the document is that, regarding the
presentation of the DNS record, I would better present how those records are
structured (Which field is where), for instance in sections 3.1, 3.4 or 4.
The document assumes that its intended readers are already familiar with
the presentation format of DNS records (and the DNS protocol more generally),
so we did not feel the need to do this. We are considering your request though.
Perhaps, a pointer to other documents that cover the presentation format would
be sufficient.
Besides, the DNS record example in section 4 is not readable in printed
versions of the document (Yes, I am old school).
I've made a small update to the draft to split the NSEC3 record example
across multiple lines. It will be in the next published revision, but you can see
it in the github repo at https://github.com/shuque/id-dnssec-compact-lies .
Thanks!
Shumon.
-- last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx
