[Last-Call] Re: Last Call: Moving RFCs 793, 1065, 1723 and 1725 to Historic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 18. Dec 2024, at 03:04, Martin Thomson <mt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> I've filed https://github.com/ietf-tools/datatracker/issues/8342 to maybe improve the presentation in places that more people look.

And because some people won’t follow that link, I’ll repeat here what I said there:

I don’t think TCP is obsolete. 

Calling superseded documents “obsolete” is not very bright. 
(I know that this is our official terminology.) 

We don’t need to rub this mistake into the eyes of unsuspecting users stumbling over RFC 793. 

In a Web UI intended for the wider public, please do use English words such as superseded in place of terms that only have meaning to people who have been in the IETF for 5+ years and are actively misleading for everyone else. 

Grüße, Carsten

-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux