> I also don't think that being in NomCom i would like to be rushed into making > decisions at the end of a very busy IETF week. I disagree. Based on what I saw last year everyone was VERY HAPPY with meeting at the end of the IETF week. But we don't need to rely on your memories or my anecdotes, we could just poll the last two NomCom's. > And finally, show me the stats about feedback for different IETF showing how > much time was given for each, and then we can talk more. This NomCom has experimented > with a new schedule, lets see if/how we can evaluate it! Are you asking for how much time each NomCom spent on the various positions? I think that would be hard to do without violating the privacy/secrecy of deliberations. Your comment "This NomCom has experimented" is wrong. Did you see my previous mail, showing that this was at least the *second* time things were done this way?[1] [1] https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf/nc6YshXaEwLLuHNQF3uC-76m_2g/
