On Sunday, September 12, 2004, at 04:02 PM, Joe Touch wrote:
It's still unclear - the document contains required wording about its
expiration, under the same document. The two statements are in
conflict in that regard.
I have some problems with retroactively changing agreements, but
your concern here is lost on me. Email, private correspondence, offline
discussions, and all sorts of things are referable. You can't
stop people from referring to documents whether they're expired
or not, public or not, etc.
Melinda
_______________________________________________
Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf