Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Christian Huitema wrote:

-----Original Message-----
From: ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx [mailto:ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf

Of

Joe Touch
Sent: Sunday, September 12, 2004 10:42 AM
To: Kai Henningsen
Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: archives (was The other parts of the report....



Kai Henningsen wrote:

Joe,

You mention a potential chilling effect an authors if the IETF
maintained an archive of past drafts, but the text in RFC 2026 is pretty
clear. Check the paragraph #1 in section 10.3.1. It says "the
contributor ... grant an unlimited perpetual, non-exclusive,
royalty-free, world-wide right and license to the ISOC and the IETF
under any copyrights in the contribution." Note the words "unlimited
perpetual" -- definitely not "limited to 6 months".


-- Christian Huitema

It's still unclear - the document contains required wording about its expiration, under the same document. The two statements are in conflict in that regard.


Joe

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________

Ietf@xxxxxxxx
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]