> I think the first step, for both 2026 and 2418, should be to produce versions with all updates and errata applied - in other words, start with what we actually have today. That would automatically include removal of all the IPR stuff, which as Scott says needs to remain separate, as it is today. It's clerical work, but essential. (I don't know whether Rich has attempted this because his drafts don't tell me.) Yes, for all the RFCs, each one that updates will be in separate draft, moving forward in numerical order. I had thought I could just do this quietly, but now I can see I'll have to be explicit :). I am not planning on touching any of the errata; I only want to do the IETF-consensus work. > 15 RFCs update RFC 2026. 292 RFCs cite it, according to the tracker. > 5 RFCs update RFC 2418. 36 RFCs cite it. Yes, and that's the number of drafts I want to get out well before November. :) What gendispatch/alldispatch does after that I'm not going to speculate.
