[Last-Call] Re: [RTG-DIR]Re: Rtgdir last call review of draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang-07

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Med,

On Jun 5, 2024, at 1:16 AM, mohamed.boucadair@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:

(4) the security section does not follow the template + does not cover the IANA module. Please refer tohttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis-11#name-security-considerations-sect.

The iana-msd-types module in draft-ietf-mpls-msd-yang, much like most IANA modules, does not define any data nodes that are writeable, readable or have RPCs defined for them. It is only defines a bunch of identities. Is there a reason to insist that the draft should call out security considerations for such modules?

Thanks.


Mahesh Jethanandani






-- 
last-call mailing list -- last-call@xxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to last-call-leave@xxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Mhonarc]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux